Wittgensteins Dilemma :: Philosophy Science Language Papers

Wittgensteins Dilemma Either wording crumb be defined or it can be investigated empirically. If style is defined then this forget be mere tautology. If language is investigated empirically then this go forth lead to a substantial yet contingent truth. The cure for this quandary for Wittgenstein in his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus was to submit the doctrine that the structure of language cannot be tell but only sh consume. This doctrine is vague and misconceived. In this essay, I provide show that it is vague and misconceived and, consequently, why it does not cure his dilemma. Wittgenstein stated in the preface of his book that he had solved the problems of philosophy. That these problems had been formulated by the malign of the logic of our language by philosophers. What philosophers had been saying could simply not be said. Their philosophy was beyond the scope of what could be said and was therefore nonsense. By plotting the limits of language, Wittgenstein expected to be able to deal with the problems of philosophy finally. Outside the limits of what can be said lies nonsense, so any speculation of language must(prenominal) occur within these limits. Wittgenstein thought that the nature of language could tell us what can and cannot be done with it. He believed this because he deduced that language had its experience limits fixed within its structure. So, in his theory of language, he revealed the structure of language to entail these limits of language which were also necessary truths. However, this meant that they would also be empty tautologies Wittgenstein believed that language disguises thought and therefore the nature of propositions would reveal the nature of the language that represents it. So, Wittgenstein based his theory of language on the nature of propositions. Within the nature of propositions, Wittgenstein found a satis factory account of logical necessity. This lead to the fact that the limits of language were logically neces sary. In this essay, I shall give an account of Wittgensteins theory of propositions and show that his elementary propositions are in fact divisible. I will outline his picture theory and show that the consequential doctrine of showing is vague and misconceived. I shall submit my own theory of the tautology as a possible cure for the in a higher place dilemma. Numbers appearing after quotes refer to the numbered passages in the Tractatus. To begin, then, some item of Wittgensteins theory of propositions is needed in order to see how the important atomic propositions mentation came about.